Trying to "rewriting the history" of the Iraq war?

[forrest]

The Truth about Iraq (www.truemajorityaction.org/bushspeech.asx)

[Longhairedskinnywhiteboy]

The Truth about Iraq (www.truemajorityaction.org/bushspeech.asx)

http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/111505.wmv

or find it here

http://www.gop.com/Default.aspx

Well, they are saying today that the intel was "created" or "distorted" by the Bush Admin, but Bush couldn't have doctored the info in 1998.

Although it's appropriate for President Bush to hurl back...We shouldn't spend too much time worrying about what the Democrats are blabbing about...America already knows the Democrats are just a bunch of gasbags.

One thing I've noticed, spending so much time on hippy sites like Dailykos and DU, there are so many people who say shit like, "Man, we all knew they were lying beofre the war!" and similiar stuff like that.

It's amazing, that their recent history can be revised so thouroughly and for such a large group as them! Ah, the benefits of the Echo Chamber...

LMAO!

[Longhairedskinnywhiteboy]

I've been wondering when shrub was gonna finally sack up and tell you what I've been telling you for a long time...

http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5924

Combat forces of the United States, Great Britain, Australia, Poland, and other countries enforced the demands of the United Nations, and put an end to Saddam’s regime. Because we acted, the Iraqi people now live in freedom, and the people of the United States are safer.

Reasonable people can disagree about the conduct of the war, but it is irresponsible for Democrats to now claim that we misled them and the American people. Leaders in my administration and members of the United States Congress from both political parties looked at the same intelligence on Iraq, and reached the same conclusion: Saddam Hussein was a threat.

Let me give you some quotes from three senior Democrat leaders: First, and I quote, “There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons.” Another senior Democrat leader said, "The war against terrorism will not be finished as long as Saddam Hussein is in power.” Here’s another quote from a senior Democrat leader: "Saddam Hussein, in effect, has thumbed his nose at the world community. And I think the President is approaching this in the right fashion.”

They spoke the truth then, and they're speaking politics now.

The truth is that investigations of intelligence on Iraq have concluded that only one person manipulated evidence and misled the world -- and that person was Saddam Hussein. In early 2004, when weapons inspector David Kay testified that he had not found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, he also testified that, “Iraq was in clear material violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441. They maintained programs and activities, and they certainly had the intentions at a point to resume their programs. So there was a lot they wanted to hide because it showed what they were doing that was illegal.”

Eight months later, weapons inspector Charles Duelfer issued a report that found, “Saddam Hussein so dominated the Iraqi regime that its strategic intent was his alone. He wanted to end sanctions while preserving the capability to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction when the sanctions were lifted.”

Some of our elected leaders have opposed this war all along. I disagreed with them, but I respect their willingness to take a consistent stand. Yet some Democrats who voted to authorize the use of force are now rewriting the past. They are playing politics with this issue and they are sending mixed signals to our troops and the enemy. And that's irresponsible



Rummy also got in on it...

http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5925

Rumsfeld quoted Berger as having said of Saddam in 1998, "He will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983." ...

Check out this video the RNC put together, (also linked above) it shows all the quotes made by the Dems that are now accusing shrub of lying.

http://www.gop.com/Default.aspx

CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/15/greenfield.iraq/index.html) buried the story and called it "rhetoric" and "satirical" because they've been going along with the lies and bush-bashing as well.

[treehugger]

http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/

[forrest]

http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/111505.wmv

or find it here

http://www.gop.com/Default.aspx

Well, they are saying today that the intel was "created" or "distorted" by the Bush Admin, but Bush couldn't have doctored the info in 1998.

Although it's appropriate for President Bush to hurl back...We shouldn't spend too much time worrying about what the Democrats are blabbing about...America already knows the Democrats are just a bunch of gasbags.

One thing I've noticed, spending so much time on hippy sites like Dailykos and DU, there are so many people who say shit like, "Man, we all knew they were lying beofre the war!" and similiar stuff like that.

It's amazing, that their recent history can be revised so thouroughly and for such a large group as them! Ah, the benefits of the Echo Chamber...

LMAO!

Quit posting those nazi links! :mad:

Republican Party
Born 1854
Died 2005

[Longhairedskinnywhiteboy]

Quit posting those nazi links!

Republican Party
Born 1854
Died 2005

Enragement ensues...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/FukNRekd/Smile/applaudit.gif http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/FukNRekd/Smile/applaudit.gif http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/FukNRekd/Smile/applaudit.gif





















http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/FukNRekd/owned/Five-Pillars-of-the-Liberal-Faith.gif

[treehugger]

Quit posting those nazi links! :mad:

Republican Party
Born 1854
Died 2005

Aww, I wuv ya, Forrest. It's pretty obvious that the ONLY reason (lol I almost typed "treason"...Freudian slip?) that the nazi is here is simply to stir up shit.

One thing about stirring up shit, the more you stir it, the more it stinks.

He must have gotten bored with shining magnifying glasses on ants in the sun....

Kath

[Dead Fan]

I think this is one of the reasons that George Washington warned against having political parties. Anybody else see this? If your a republican than anything against you is liberal rhetoric, and vice versa. If you have parties you cant have ideas. The second somebody has an idea it is either right (in agreeance with you) or party lies. This goes for either side. That is very well shown on this site recently. Anything that LHSWB posts is from a NAZI site (Facism the extreem right all conservatives are NAZIS to the left) and anything that forrest posts is (to LHSWB) communst (the extreme of the left, to him all liberals are commies). Also with parties people (politicians) cant be heard. Do you think that there would be a crappy two party system if there were no parties? Bush and Kerry wouldnt be the big candidates they would simply be candidates and people also wouldnt be as stuck on the thought of "hes a democrat so he believes in this so i wont vote for him" and vice versa it would be voting for the man not the party. So lets just give up the party rhetoric and give ideas.

[forrest]

Aww, I wuv ya, Forrest. It's pretty obvious that the ONLY reason (lol I almost typed "treason"...Freudian slip?) that the nazi is here is simply to stir up shit.

One thing about stirring up shit, the more you stir it, the more it stinks.

He must have gotten bored with shining magnifying glasses on ants in the sun....

Kath

IF YOU HATE CIVIL LIBERTIES VOTE REPUBLICAN! :group_hug

[forrest]

I think this is one of the reasons that George Washington warned against having political parties. Anybody else see this? If your a republican than anything against you is liberal rhetoric, and vice versa. If you have parties you cant have ideas. The second somebody has an idea it is either right (in agreeance with you) or party lies. This goes for either side. That is very well shown on this site recently. Anything that LHSWB posts is from a NAZI site (Facism the extreem right all conservatives are NAZIS to the left) and anything that forrest posts is (to LHSWB) communst (the extreme of the left, to him all liberals are commies). Also with parties people (politicians) cant be heard. Do you think that there would be a crappy two party system if there were no parties? Bush and Kerry wouldnt be the big candidates they would simply be candidates and people also wouldnt be as stuck on the thought of "hes a democrat so he believes in this so i wont vote for him" and vice versa it would be voting for the man not the party. So lets just give up the party rhetoric and give ideas.

Washington's Farewell Address 1796

Friends and Citizens:

The period for a new election of a citizen to administer the executive government of the United States being not far distant, and the time actually arrived when your thoughts must be employed in designating the person who is to be clothed with that important trust, it appears to me proper, especially as it may conduce to a more distinct expression of the public voice, that I should now apprise you of the resolution I have formed, to decline being considered among the number of those out of whom a choice is to be made.

I beg you, at the same time, to do me the justice to be assured that this resolution has not been taken without a strict regard to all the considerations appertaining to the relation which binds a dutiful citizen to his country; and that in withdrawing the tender of service, which silence in my situation might imply, I am influenced by no diminution of zeal for your future interest, no deficiency of grateful respect for your past kindness, but am supported by a full conviction that the step is compatible with both.
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/washing.htm