Longhairedskinnywhiteboy
11-15-2005, 11:41 AM
J'ever notice how hypocritical Libs are?
Take the Plame "scandal" fer instance. Here's a CIA agent (not an operative) workng at Langley, hasn't been covert for something like 7 years, gets her photo on the front page of magazines, is known by HUNDREDS of media types to BE a CIA agent, etc.
She is "outted" by a guy in the White House who KNOWS all this about her and therefore KNOWS he is not outting her. Still, it's front page, above the fold NEWS!!! and first-3-minutes of every NEWS!!! broadcast for weeks. This agent (not an operative) is in no more danger after this outting than she was before, unless you classify helping her husband sell his book of lies as putting her at risk.
And the Libs are all now screaming(through a veil of crocodile tears) about this "treason!" Guffaw!
Then, we have the Washington Post getting a leak no doubt from either inside the CIA or from someone in Congress who sits on the CIA oversight committee (these are the ONLY 2 places this could have come from) about a network of top-secret (as opposed to super-duper-ubber-secret in the Plame case) covert facilities within existing prisons in Eastern European, ally nations that are acting as surrogates for the CIA and allowing us to detain enemy combatants in these places for a number of very good reasons; they have identified the names and locations of these facilities putting EVERYONE in those places at extreme risk, giving the terrorists a roadmap to the places and putting the entire host country at risk from retaliatory terrorist attacks.
On top of this, the Post also "outted" the CIA transport "company," going so far as to actually provide sketches of the aircraft including their identification numbers--there can be NO other reason for this than TO provide those numbers. A photo of the actual craft would be one thing...but a sketch? Who would need a sketch of a passenger aircraft in a story like this?
Libs, generally, are goofs. We all know this. But when they are so desperate to embarass this president and/or traitorous as this, shouldn't our libs, last week throwing parties because the "traitor" Scooter Libby was finally indicted (for something somewhat less than treason, turns out) are utterly silent on this.
I wonder why?
Take the Plame "scandal" fer instance. Here's a CIA agent (not an operative) workng at Langley, hasn't been covert for something like 7 years, gets her photo on the front page of magazines, is known by HUNDREDS of media types to BE a CIA agent, etc.
She is "outted" by a guy in the White House who KNOWS all this about her and therefore KNOWS he is not outting her. Still, it's front page, above the fold NEWS!!! and first-3-minutes of every NEWS!!! broadcast for weeks. This agent (not an operative) is in no more danger after this outting than she was before, unless you classify helping her husband sell his book of lies as putting her at risk.
And the Libs are all now screaming(through a veil of crocodile tears) about this "treason!" Guffaw!
Then, we have the Washington Post getting a leak no doubt from either inside the CIA or from someone in Congress who sits on the CIA oversight committee (these are the ONLY 2 places this could have come from) about a network of top-secret (as opposed to super-duper-ubber-secret in the Plame case) covert facilities within existing prisons in Eastern European, ally nations that are acting as surrogates for the CIA and allowing us to detain enemy combatants in these places for a number of very good reasons; they have identified the names and locations of these facilities putting EVERYONE in those places at extreme risk, giving the terrorists a roadmap to the places and putting the entire host country at risk from retaliatory terrorist attacks.
On top of this, the Post also "outted" the CIA transport "company," going so far as to actually provide sketches of the aircraft including their identification numbers--there can be NO other reason for this than TO provide those numbers. A photo of the actual craft would be one thing...but a sketch? Who would need a sketch of a passenger aircraft in a story like this?
Libs, generally, are goofs. We all know this. But when they are so desperate to embarass this president and/or traitorous as this, shouldn't our libs, last week throwing parties because the "traitor" Scooter Libby was finally indicted (for something somewhat less than treason, turns out) are utterly silent on this.
I wonder why?